Context
Which profession, organization or practice is being studied?
A journal for applied intelligence
Artificial intelligence becomes evidence when it transforms a profession.
An interdisciplinary open-access journal for investigating, assessing and discussing the applications, limits and responsibilities of AI in professional, organizational and institutional contexts.
A journal with one clear rule
AI may assist the process; scientific accountability always remains with people.
We publish evidence on how intelligent systems reshape decisions, services, knowledge and professional work.
We assess rigour, impact, limits, governance and real adoption conditions—not technology novelty alone.
Scope compass
Five questions before submitting.
A manuscript need not address every dimension equally, but it must show a clear connection between AI and a relevant professional issue.
View aims and scopeTechnology
Which AI system, method or model is examined?
Evidence
Which data or method support the claims?
Impact
Which result, risk or change is assessed?
Accountability
How are ethics, safety and human oversight addressed?
Policy Center
A useful policy for every role.
Editorial rules should not be a hard-to-find document. Here they are organized by audience, stage of the process and responsibility.
For authors
Instructions, authorship, AI use, data, ethics, conflicts, licence and required declarations.
- Author guidelines
- Use of AI
- Data and reproducibility
For reviewers
Double-blind review, confidentiality, conflicts of interest, AI use and review criteria.
- Confidentiality
- Conflicts
- Review form
For editors
Decision criteria, recusals, integrity, appeals and human oversight of AI.
- Editorial workflow
- Misconduct
- Responsible automation
Transparency
Open access, CC BY 4.0, publication schedule, preservation, metadata and public information.
- Open access
- Publication schedule
- Digital preservation
Editorial process
Four steps. Clear accountability.
Submission and checks
OJS acknowledges the submission. Metadata, files, declarations, language, anonymization and formal requirements are checked.
Editorial assessment
An editor checks scope, originality, contribution, integrity and ethical conditions before deciding whether the manuscript proceeds to review.
Double-blind peer review
At least two external specialists assess the manuscript without knowing the authors’ identity; additional reviewers may be invited when needed.
Decision and publication
The responsible editor decides. Revisions, licences and metadata remain traceable; after acceptance, production and issue placement are prepared.